In the last episode of the Authorised Push Payment Fraud podcast series, we focused on the Quincecare duty and looked into several judgements where the banks' liability under this duty was under the spotlight.
Episode three focuses on Stanford International Bank vs HSBC, where the Courts ruled that there was no basis for a Quincecare claim. Our hosts discuss and analyse the case and its impact.
You are switching to the United States
This selection will switch the website from presenting information primarily about the United Kingdom to information about the United States. If you would like to switch back, you may use location selection options at the top of the page.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any legal matter until we authorize you to do so. To initiate a possible representation, please call one of our lawyers or staff members.
By clicking the “ACCEPT” button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that, even if you submit information that you consider confidential in an effort to retain us, our review of that information will not create an obligation on us to keep it confidential and will not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.
Please click the “ACCEPT” button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.
