Alerts
Contributors
An audio summary of this article is available in the player below. Scroll to keep reading.
Listen and subscribe to Womble Perspectives wherever you get your podcasts.
Pennsylvania recently introduced its own Commercial Finance Disclosure Law (“CFDL”), following the lead of other states with laws requiring consumer-like disclosures in certain commercial loans, including California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, New York, Virginia, and Utah. Pennsylvania House Bill 1792 is substantially similar to a bill introduced in a prior legislative session.
Unlike other states, Pennsylvania’s approach does not propose comprehensive multi-section legislation. Instead, it proposes an abbreviated, two-section amendment to Pennsylvania’s Loan Interest and Protection Law (PALIPL), a law focused primarily on consumer lending protection in the residential mortgage lending space and a law that supplements other existing lending laws.
House Bill 1792 proposes to expand the reach of the PALIPL to include “a person who extends a specific offer of commercial financing to a recipient” and would require the lender to disclose consumer-type information to “small businesses” at the time of the financing offer. It would also require a signature from the small business for each disclosure before executing the commercial financing transaction.
Small business is defined as “a business of fewer than five hundred (500) employees that is presented a specific commercial financing offer by a [lender].” “Person” under the PALIPL appears to have little limitation, if any. The disclosures required include the total amount of funds to be provided, the total dollar cost of the financing, the term, payment terms, prepayment policies, and the total cost of the financing expressed as an annualized rate. There is no loan amount reference, unlike other commercial financing disclosure laws.
What materially differentiates House Bill 1792 from other CFDLs to date is that it expressly provides for a private right of action, in addition to regulatory enforcement and penalties. This means a borrower may commence an action against the lender for disclosure violations and could collect attorneys’ fees in such an action. A private right of action currently exists under the PALIPL, and the bill amendment adding the commercial finance disclosure requirements does not negate it. Accordingly, a violation of commercial finance disclosure requirements would provide a private right of action as one of several remedies. It remains unclear if the bill’s sponsors intended this deviation from other CFDLs or whether a private right of action was an unintended consequence of adding provisions to the PALIPL and will be addressed in the coming legislative session.
As of the date of this post, the following states have proposed various forms of commercial financing laws this legislative session: Illinois (Senate Bill 2234 and House Bill 3064), Kansas (Senate Bill 245), Maryland (Senate Bill 496, which failed); Mississippi (Senate Bill 2619 and House Bill 1271, both of which failed), Missouri (Senate Bill 187 and House Bill 584, both of which failed), North Carolina (Senate Bill 539 and House Bill 662), Texas (Senate Bill 1918 and House Bill 4359, both of which failed). Bills remain pending in New Jersey from the carry-over session (Senate Bill 819 and House Bill 2150). Proposed commercial financing laws have also been proposed at the federal level (Senate Bill 2021 and House Bill 4192).
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP is closely monitoring developments in this area and remains ready to assist clients in navigating these laws and legislation.
Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated. The information contained herein is general in nature and is not offered and cannot be considered as legal advice for any particular situation. The author has provided the links referenced above, if any, for information purposes only and by doing so, does not adopt or incorporate the contents. Any federal tax advice provided in this communication is not intended or written by the author to be used, and cannot be used by the recipient, for the purpose of avoiding penalties which may be imposed on the recipient by the IRS. Please contact the author if you would like to receive written advice in a format which complies with IRS rules and may be relied upon to avoid penalties.
